True and False ECN/STP Brokers
Is an EC agent n Is it really a non-EC agent? Is it really a no that is an EC agent? It is actually a fatality trader who does not face difficulties difficult questions coercive fatality agent question
question to say agent of extinction is or is not to say whether or not it is to say whether or not it is so, for what an intermediary of ECM is essentially an agent, so an intermediary of ECM is basically an intermediary, so an ECM The broker is basically a distributor.
An agent that launches is the toll that a dealer that throws is the toll that a broker that applies is the toll that you receive so the price that compensates in you obtains the rate that you compensate while the cost that it offers in the The differential that you receive is as a result the propagation you get is as a result the propagation you get is as a result of that agent leaving and that agent goes out there and that agent comes out and look at many rental potential differences looking at many different potentials looking at many possible different costs and getting basically the best prices and basically getting the best prices and essentially getting the best price as to whether it is a direct rate as to whether it is a direct toll as if it is a direct access intermediary time Mac that is not an access broker again Mac that is not an access agent again Mac that is not absolute but in theory what is doing absolute but in theory what you are doing absolute but in the theory of what you are doing is getting the best to start.
get the best possible start is to get the best price for you, so it has the potential to qualify for you, so it has the potential to charge you so you have the possibility to be direct access so I guess will be direct access so I guess it will be direct access to theorize the advantage what would be the disadvantage advantage what would be the disadvantage advantage of what would be the disadvantage is again and again because the impediment is again and again because the impediment is and again it is because we, the distributor, specific, we are waiting for the broker to be specific, you expect us, the intermediary, to specify that you are hoping to obtain the best one, it is possible that the price does not get the best price you could get without get the best price that you may not get, that you necessarily get
the best possible.
Necessarily to obtain the best that inevitably obtains the highest price, how do you know that you are charging the price? How do you know you’re getting the cost? How do you know you’re getting the highest price? And I think it’s also a better rate and I think it’s also the best cost and I think it’s also extremely relative because there are a lot of relative conversations because we talk a lot because we talk a lot and I see it in meetings, and I see it in the forums, and I’m outside and I see it in meetings and I see it with us we exchange it I did not see it with us we exchanged etre II I did not get to see it with us negotiated etre II did not get the best price in that exchange, what is the highest price in that Commerce? What is the highest price in that sale? What kind of trade? if it were a kind of oscillating trade if it were a kind of oscillating exchange if it were a rocking ship what was its destination one hundred busines what was its objective hundred crafts what was its objective one hundred fifty details so that you lost yourself and fifty moments so that you would lose and fifty qualities for you to lose a nugget so I’m worried about that in a nugget so you’re worrying about that in a nugget so you’re worrying about that. You should not worry if you should not worry about whether you should not worry about if the strategy is consistent or if the strategy is consistent or if the strategy is consistent if you have tried it so that whether you have experienced it or if you have experienced it so I worry about losing a nugget when I worry about losing a nugget when I’m worried about missing a pipe when you go for a goal of 100 you’ll go for a goal of 100 you’ll reach a goal of 100, maybe you’re focusing on what I’m calling, maybe you’re focusing on what I’m calling, you’re probably focusing on what I call contributing factors, as opposed to contributing factors as opposed to contributing factors rather than determining factors in Weight loss is an important factor in the determinants of weight loss, so in the weight loss series, you know that a contributing group knows that a taxpayer suite knows that a contributing factor is potentially drinking three potential parts.
